Friday, October 16, 2026HotTea verified storyVerified 1:15 AM PDT
← Back to the Friday, October 16, 2026 edition

952,008 clinicians asked OpenEvidence 271 million questions

A JAMA study published October 15 examined OpenEvidence use from January 1, 2024, through June 30, 2026. It counted 952,008 US clinicians, including 556,200 physicians, and 271 million queries. The other users included nurse practitioners, physician assistants and other licensed clinicians. Monthly active users reached 703,265 in June 2026. The study counted a user as active after the user submitted at least one question that month.

Verified 1:15 AM PDT · 3 original sources

The observational study covers one platform. It does not show whether the answers were accurate or helped patients. The researchers could not tell whether clinicians asked questions during patient care, preparation or general learning.

The study counted each follow-up question separately, so its query total is not a patient total. OpenEvidence supplied the data and helped analyze it. Several authors worked for the company. JAMA's accompanying editorial also warns that citations do not validate generated answers.

Researchers still need to test whether the tool answers treatment and medication questions correctly. They also need to connect its use to later clinical decisions and patient outcomes before claiming that it improves care.

Audit the story

Original sources

Company claims remain company claims. Follow the reporting and judge the evidence directly.

  1. JAMAClinician Use of an Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Clinical Information Platform ↗
  2. JAMAEngaging With Medical Evidence in the Age of AI ↗
  3. Harvard Medical SchoolFirst Large-Scale Study Shows How Doctors Use AI in Medicine ↗

Continue the edition

Read the full edition.

Read the full editionListen to the daily audio →