ChatGPT invented witnesses in a murder appeal. The lawyer filed them
The New Mexico Supreme Court held attorney Stephen D. Aarons in direct contempt over a brief in a murder appeal. The brief included false testimony and wholly fabricated witnesses. The court's September 9 order says Aarons acknowledged using ChatGPT to prepare the filing. He also admitted signing it without checking its factual claims or legal authorities.
This went beyond invented case citations. The filing added people and testimony that did not exist in the record of a criminal case. The lawyer signed the brief, so he still had the duty to check it. That duty did not pass to the software vendor. The order does not decide whether ChatGPT is safe for every legal use. It shows that fluent writing cannot replace checking the record.
Read article →